Legal Opinion
Rutgers v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 16, 1998No. 96-399CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Senior Judge.
On July 3, 1996, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (plaintiff or Rutgers) filed a Complaint against defendant, the United States of America (United States or government), praying for a declaration that defendant had no contractual rights in the invention of an electrostrictive driving device and process for sonic wave projection (invention ’9791) governed by United States Patent No. 5,229,979 (patent ’979). On January 23, 1998, the United States of America filed Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative Partial Summary…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Charles C. Johnston and Gordon P. Ramsey, as Trustees of the Amec Liquidating Trust v. Ivac CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- CTA Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Allstates Air Cargo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- CIVIX-DDI, LLC v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2000
- Pilley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Clearwater Constructors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006