Legal Opinion

Pilley v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 30, 2006No. 05-382 CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

DAMICH, Chief Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiff, who is appearing pro se, is the inventor and owner of nine U.S. patents directed to systems and methods for air traffic control using a global positioning system (“GPS”). In this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1498, Plaintiff seeks damages for the alleged infringement by Defendant of all nine patents. Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, in which Defendant asserts that pursuant to the patent rights clause contained in a contract between Plaintiff and Defendant, Defendant was granted a paid-up, non-exclusive…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Intellect Wireless, Inc. v. HTC Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  2. Advanced Aerospace Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. Ideal Innovations, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API