Legal Opinion
Timely Products Corp. v. Arron
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 4, 1969No. Civ. No. 11864PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULINGS ON MOTION TO CITE IN ADDITIONAL PARTIES AND TO AMEND ANSWER
ZAMPANO, District Judge.
In this patent infringement action, both plaintiff Costanzo and defendant Stanley Arron, former business associates, have been granted patents embodying a low-voltage, electrically heated sock. Plaintiff Costanzo gave an exclusive license to produce socks under his patent to Benjamin M. Hines on December 27, 1965. On January 4, 1966, the Timely Products Corporation was incorporated by Benjamin M. Hines and Lois D. Hines who are now its president and vice-president respectively. The exclusive license was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bewal, Inc., a Corporation of Kansas and Benjamine C. Edwards, Jr. v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Stanley Works v. Haeger Potteries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964
- Reeves Brothers, Inc. v. US Laminating Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- International Manufacturing Co. v. Landon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co. v. John R. Jurgensen Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
- Mountain States Sports, Inc. v. SharmanDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1972
- A.L. Williams & Associates, Inc. v. D.R. Richardson & Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1983
- Independence Tube Corp. v. Copperweld Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1977
- Dunham v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.