Diffey v. Riverside County Sheriff's Department
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GAUT, J.
1. Introduction
The Riverside County Sheriff’s Department (County) would not hire Teg Diffey as a deputy sheriff because he is color-blind. The more accurate diagnostic term for Diffey’s condition is “deficient color vision” or “color-deficient.”
Diffey sued defendants—the County, and a nurse, Rebecca Perkins— under FEHA (the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.) and the ADA (the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213) for discrimination and retaliation. After Diffey’s offer of proof, the court granted a directed verdict…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Albertson's, Inc. v. KirkingburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- John Olson v. General Electric Astrospace AKA Martin-Marrietta AstrospaceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Bridges v. City of BossierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Daley v. KochCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gelfo v. Lockheed Martin CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Colmenares v. Braemar Country Club, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Diaz v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Hastings v. Department of CorrectionsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Bryan v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.