Legal Opinion

Bryan v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 2, 2004No. C 01-01730 WHA, C 02-02601 WHAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ISSUE OF FEHA DISABILITY AND CERTIFYING THE CASE TO THE COURT OF APPEALS UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1292(b)

ALSUP, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

In this case under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act, plaintiffs contend that defendant United Parcel Service, Inc., discriminated against them by excluding them from working as full-time, package-car delivery drivers because of an alleged disability, namely, the loss of vision in one eye. The threshold question is whether plaintiffs are disabled within the meaning of FEHA. As an issue of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Albertson's, Inc. v. KirkingburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Cynthia Thompson v. Holy Family Hospital, a Division of Dominican Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Colmenares v. Braemar Country Club, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Diaz v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2005
  2. Foster v. City of OaklandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
  3. Oyarzo v. Tuolumne Fire DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
  4. Melendrez v. All Kids AcademyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
  5. Morgan v. AT&T Communications of Cal. CA6California Court of Appeal · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API