Legal Opinion

People v. Hinds

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 6, 1984No. Crim. 6600PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANSON (P. D.), J.

Michael James Hinds appeals from a judgment of conviction of first degree murder with personal use of a firearm (Pen. Code, §§ 187, 12022.5), challenging the admissibility of his extrajudicial statements to police on Miranda (Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d 694, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 10 A.L.R.3d 974]) and voluntariness grounds. Respondent concedes Miranda error and “overbearing” police tactics. This wrongful conduct compels us to reverse; because a taped confession obtained in gross violation of appellant’s Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights was…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. CahillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API