Nenzel v. Rochester Silver Corporation
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Lower court having found relation of landlord and tenant and privity of contract did not exist could enter no judgment whatsoever. It specifically found defendants were entitled to use of water under agreement between Nenzel and Nenzel Crown Point Mining Co., rights thereunder having been assigned to defendant, and payment made. To be guilty of unlawful detainer, one must be tenant. Rev. Laws, 5588, as amended, Stats. 1917, 31.
Relation of landlord and tenant as to incorporeal hereditament cannot exist. Remedy of plaintiffs, if they had one, was in equity. Agreement was to furnish specific…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bergman v. KearneyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1917
- Goddard v. FultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Sylvis v. SylvisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
- Alden v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
- Cuenin v. HalbouerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Application of FilippiniNevada Supreme Court · 1949
- Thiess v. RapaportNevada Supreme Court · 1937
- In Re C & P Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
- Carson City v. Estate of LompaNevada Supreme Court · 1972
- Ministerio Roca Solida, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.