Legal Opinion

Thiess v. Rapaport

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1937No. 3169PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A motion for judgment on the pleadings is in the nature of a demurrer. 1 Bancroft Code Pleading, p. 917, sec. 630; 49 C.J. 668, sec. 945; 21 R.C.L. 594, sec. 142; 21 Cal. Jur. 234, sec. 163, n. 10; 21 Cal. Jur. 240, sec. 166, n. 5.

If the answer sets up affirmative matter constituting a defense, a motion for judgment on the pleadings will be denied. 1 Bancroft Code Pleading 925, sec. 637; 21 Cal. Jur. 238, n. 13; Parks v. Western Union, 45 Nev. 411, 197 P. 580, 204 P. 884.

The denials contained in the respective answers of the defendants to each cause of action of the complaint are good denials.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Piercy v. SabinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Coles v. SoulsbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Goddard v. FultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  4. J. E. Burke & Co. v. BuckNevada Supreme Court · 1909
  5. California State Telegraph Co. v. PattersonNevada Supreme Court · 1865

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnston v. DelayNevada Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Petition of FullerNevada Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Squires v. Mergenthaler Linotype Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Graff v. Shipman Bros. Transfer Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Jefferson County v. AdwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API