Legal Opinion

State v. Weissenfluh

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 4, 1981No. C7595, CA 18047PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction of Forgery in the First Degree for passing a counterfeit $100 bill. Trial was to the court. Defendant assigns erroi to: (1) the use of a "practically certain” standard to find that defendant knew the bill was counterfeit; and (2) the denial of defendant’s motion for directed verdict for lack of sufficient evidence on the two elements of knowledge and intent to defraud. We affirm.

We review the facts in the light most favorable to the state. State v. Steffen, 39 Or App 571, 573, 592 P2d 1081 (1979). In cashing a third-party check for $2,000 at a bank in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. NeelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  2. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. State v. FrasierOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. State v. SteffenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API