Legal Opinion
Dean v. Firor
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided April 20, 1984No. 6704PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIMOND, Senior Justice.
The issue in this case is whether Appellant Ellen Dean waived her right to a peremptory challenge of the master assigned to her case. We conclude that she did not waive her peremptory right and set aside the judgment adopting the master’s findings.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Walter Firor and Betty Lou Firor were divorced on December 14, 1976. Their property settlement agreement provided in part that Walter was to retain ownership of Firor Construction Company, a close corporation. At the time of the divorce, the company was having financial and legal…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Donald and Ronald HILL, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. the DURIRON COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Fred A. Cruz, Etc. v. W. B. (Bill) HauckCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Miller v. SearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- C. E. Bradshaw, Sr. v. Vic ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re the Estate of FieldsAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Gonzales v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Peter v. Progressive Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Staso v. State, Department of TransportationAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Marriage of Gardner v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.