Legal Opinion

Staso v. State, Department of Transportation

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1995No. S-6236PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This petition for review arises from a denial of a peremptory disqualification sought under Alaska Civil Rule 42(c). Michael Staso (Staso) sought to peremptorily disqualify the judge assigned to a case he refiled after it had been dismissed pursuant to Civil Rule 16.1(g). The disqualification was denied. The trial court concluded that Staso’s peremptory disqualification of the assigned judge in the dismissed case had exhausted his right of peremptory disqualification. We reverse.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Michael Staso refiled a previously dismissed suit…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. McKinnon v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Ford v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Gieffels v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Tunley v. Municipality of Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hymes v. DeRamusAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Alyssa B. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Cook v. RowlandAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. DeVaney v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. DeVaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Terry S. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API