Legal Opinion

Marriage of Gardner v. Gardner

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 5, 1986No. C6-86-209PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HUSPENI, Judge.

OPINION

Respondent Barbara Gardner brought a motion for an increase in appellant George Gardner’s child support obligation. Appellant responded with a motion to have the matter heard before a judge, rather than a referee. The referee denied appellant’s motion, considered respondent’s motion, and issued a recommended order increasing appellant’s support obligation. That order was confirmed by the trial court and appellant appeals, claiming that the referee erred in not honoring appellant’s request to have the pending matters heard before a judge, and that the increase in child…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moylan v. MoylanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Magnaleasing, Inc. v. Staten Island MallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  3. Magnaleasing, Inc. v. Staten Island Mall, Blackfriars Realty Corp., and Tottenham Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. Dean v. FirorAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Stevie L. HAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FOODMAKER, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anderson v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API