Legal Opinion
In Re Arsenault
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
Decided July 3, 2007No. 06-05452-MGWPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER SUSTAINING TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION OF AMENDED CHAPTER 13 PLAN
MICHAEL G. WILLIAMSON, Bankruptcy Judge.
In determining a debtor’s “projected disposable income” under section 1325(b)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code, 1 the presumptive starting point is the disposable income number obtained from the Chapter 13 Statement of Current Monthly Income and Calculation of Commitment Period and Disposable Income (“Form B22C”). The disposable income number on Form B22C is calculated using the historic six-month “current monthly income” as defined in section 101(10A). 2 The projected disposable…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Public Citizen v. United States Department of JusticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- City of Chicago v. Environmental Defense FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- In Re HardacreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re CrinkUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2009
- In Re ParadaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2008
- Mancl v. Chatterton (In Re Mancl)District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2008
- In Re WilsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008
- In Re RalstonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.