Martin v. Beverage Capital Corp.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CHASANOW, Judge.
In this appeal, we are asked to settle a dispute as to the identity of the payment source upon which a surviving spouse, in a workers’ compensation death benefits case, must continue to be dependent in order to receive additional benefits after the initial maximum award of $45,000 has been paid out. Specifically, we are called upon to determine whether the phrase “continues to be wholly dependent,” as found in Maryland Code (1991 Repl.Vol.), Labor and Employment Article, § 9-681 (d), 1 refers to an ongoing dependency on the deceased worker’s wages or the generally lesser…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Oaks v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Marriott Employees Federal Credit Union v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Gargliano v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Adamson v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Harris v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Langston v. LangstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Marsheck v. Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Livering v. Richardson's RestaurantCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.