Legal Opinion

Martin v. Beverage Capital Corp.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 25, 1999No. 60, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASANOW, Judge.

In this appeal, we are asked to settle a dispute as to the identity of the payment source upon which a surviving spouse, in a workers’ compensation death benefits case, must continue to be dependent in order to receive additional benefits after the initial maximum award of $45,000 has been paid out. Specifically, we are called upon to determine whether the phrase “continues to be wholly dependent,” as found in Maryland Code (1991 Repl.Vol.), Labor and Employment Article, § 9-681 (d), 1 refers to an ongoing dependency on the deceased worker’s wages or the generally lesser…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Oaks v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Marriott Employees Federal Credit Union v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Gargliano v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Adamson v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Harris v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Langston v. LangstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Marsheck v. Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Livering v. Richardson's RestaurantCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API