Legal Opinion

Langston v. Langston

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 13, 2001No. 18, Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATTAGLIA, Judge.

We granted a writ of certiorari to determine whether alimony payments may be modified retroactively, i.e. to a date prior to the filing of a pleading seeking such modification. The petitioner, Lori K. Langston, here challenges the decision of the Court of Special Appeals which held that respondent, Gary W. Langston, M.D., could obtain such retroactive modification of alimony payments.

I. Facts

Gary W. Langston, M.D., respondent, and Lori K. Lang-ston, petitioner, were married in Montgomery County on November 7, 1988. Lori did not work outside the home while married, but instead…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Taylor v. NationsBank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Oaks v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. COLOMIRIS v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Condon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Cheney v. Bell National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Hill v. Cross Country Settlement, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Sy-Lene of Washington, Inc. v. Starwood Urban Retail II, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Nesbit v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Harvey v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Atlantic Contracting & Material Co. v. Ulico Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API