Fleury v. State
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
Appeal by the New Hampshire Department of *529Employment Security and Linderhof Realty, Inc. from a de novo determination by the superior court under RSA 282:5 G (1) (Supp. 1973) and (3). The court concluded, contrary to the finding of the department’s appeal tribunal, that the plaintiff had not violated RSA 282:14 D so as to warrant disqualification from unemployment compensation benefits, and ordered $882 in benefits paid to him. Defendants’ exceptions to the findings and rulings and various other exceptions were reserved and transferred by Mullavey, J.
RSA 282:14 D provides in pertinent part as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hallahan v. RileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946
- Neilsen v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- Hallahan v. RileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
3Cited by8 opinions
- Meyer v. Skyline Mobile HomesIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Wheeler v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Riesenberg v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Coutu v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Meyer v. Skyline Mobile HomesIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.