Legal Opinion

Fleury v. State

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 30, 1974No. 6833PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

Appeal by the New Hampshire Department of *529Employment Security and Linderhof Realty, Inc. from a de novo determination by the superior court under RSA 282:5 G (1) (Supp. 1973) and (3). The court concluded, contrary to the finding of the department’s appeal tribunal, that the plaintiff had not violated RSA 282:14 D so as to warrant disqualification from unemployment compensation benefits, and ordered $882 in benefits paid to him. Defendants’ exceptions to the findings and rulings and various other exceptions were reserved and transferred by Mullavey, J.

RSA 282:14 D provides in pertinent part as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hallahan v. RileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946
  2. Neilsen v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  3. Hallahan v. RileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Meyer v. Skyline Mobile HomesIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Wheeler v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  3. Riesenberg v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  4. Coutu v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  5. Meyer v. Skyline Mobile HomesIdaho Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API