Hallahan v. Riley

Four years ago the plaintiff was unemployed. After reporting to and filing claims for benefits with the defendant, her case slumped forward until it has completed the entire gamut of possible administrative and judicial review. This has involved a total of nine hearings or arguments or both before the defendant, the Superior Court and this court. Omitting the details her case proceeded as follows:(1) Examiner of Unemployment Division — ineligible for present and future benefits.(2) Appeal Tribunal of Unemployment Divison — eligible for present but not future benefits.(3) Supreme Court (94 N.…