Hallahan v. Riley
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.
The Unemployment Compensation statute, R. L., c. 218, s. 5, Par. G, authorizes a direct appeal to this court by “any party aggrieved by any ruling of law in any proceeding hereunder . . . ” We are not therefore, concerned with the correctness of any findings of fact which may underlie the decision complained of. For any person aggrieved by a decision of fact, the statute above mentioned provides another remedy by appeal to the'Superior Court. We are, therefore, called upon to consider in this proceeding only the question whether the decision of the Appeal Tribunal in any way violated the law…
2Cited by22 opinions
- Bayly Manufacturing Co. v. Department of EmploymentSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
- Keystone Steel & Wire Division v. Department of LaborAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Pregent v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecurityDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1973
- Dubkowski v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Wolfgram v. Employment Security AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.