Legal Opinion
HomeBingo Network, Inc. v. Chayevsky
District Court, S.D. Alabama
Decided April 21, 2006No. Civ.A. 05-0701-WS-BPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STEELE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss (doc. 21) filed by defendants Mike Macke, Tim Minard and Gene Chayevsky (collectively, “Movants”). The Motion has been briefed and is ripe for disposition. 1
I. Background.
On December 5, 2005, plaintiff, The HomeBingo Network, Inc. (“HomeBingo”), filed a Complaint for Patent Infringement (doc. 1) in this District Court, naming a dozen defendants. 2 For purposes of the pending Motions, the critical defendants are Cadillac Jack, Inc. (“Cadillac Jack”), a Georgia corporation with its principal place of business…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Beverly Hills Fan Company v. Royal Sovereign Corp. And Ultec Enterprises Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Meier Ex Rel. Meier v. Sun International Hotels, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Sculptchair, Inc. v. Century Arts, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- The Akro Corporation v. Ken LukerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Seven Networks, LLC v. Google LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2018
- Hillery v. Allstate Indemnity Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2010
- Continental Motors, Inc. v. Jewell Aircraft, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2012
- Roblor Marketing Group, Inc. v. GPS Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
- Boston Scientific Corp. v. Cook Group Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.