Legal Opinion
Merwin Michael Hill v. State of Arizona
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 22, 1995No. 94-15455Published
1Opinion of the Court
48 F.3d 1228
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Merwin Michael HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF ARIZONA, et al., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 94-15455.
Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 15, 1995*.
Decided Feb. 22, 1995.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; No. CV-93-00084-CAM, Carl A. Muecke, District Judge, Presiding.
D.Airz. [APPEALING AFTER…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Noll v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Preston Broughton v. Cutter Laboratories Hospital Staff of Arizona State Prison Dr. Clements Dr. HydeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.