Legal Opinion

Preston Broughton v. Cutter Laboratories Hospital Staff of Arizona State Prison Dr. Clements Dr. Hyde

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 1, 1980No. CA 77-3957PublishedCited by 782 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the summary dismissal of a pro se complaint seeking damages and injunctive relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The appellant, Preston Broughton, is a state prisoner. Appellant filed this civil rights action in district court, joining Cutter Laboratories and the Arizona State Prison Hospital staff as defendants and alleging that he had contracted infectious hepatitis while participating in Cutter Laboratories’ blood plasma purchasing program. Cutter, with the apparent consent and cooperation of the prison, bought blood plasma from the prisoners, including appellant.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Herbert M. Crawford v. Griffin Bell, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. William David Potter v. Tom McCall Governor of the State of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

3Cited by782 opinions

  1. Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. David Poe Wood v. Vernon G. Housewright, George SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Noll v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Lemire v. California Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Robert M. Schucker v. Terry G. Rockwood James C. Fukuhara Dewar, Romig & Rockwood, Inc. Anne D. McGowan Delay, Laredo & McGowan Maurice JourdaneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

777 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API