Legal Opinion
Montgomery v. Scott
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided September 17, 1992No. 91-CV-6338PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
Plaintiff John Montgomery (“Montgomery”) brings this action against defendants William Scott, Robert Nearing, John Fer-ster and William Snider to set aside the administrative forfeiture of $32,000 in United States currency. Plaintiff challenges the forfeiture on two grounds: first, that he was deprived of his Fifth Amendment right to due process because the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (the “DEA”) did not provide him with proper notice of the forfeiture proceedings; and second, that the DEA refused to provide him with information…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Andre Lopez Polanco v. U.S. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Jorge Sarit and Dennie Espaillat v. U.S. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Alberto Boero v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Small, Richard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- People Ex Rel. Devine v. $30,700.00 United States CurrencyIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.