Small, Richard v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WALD, Circuit Judge:
Richard Small asserts that the United States failed to make adequate efforts to give him notice of forfeiture proceedings affecting property that he claims to own. The district court granted summary judgment for the United States, concluding that the United States’s efforts to contact Small met the standards set by the Due Process Clause. On appeal, Small contests this finding. We find that the United States should have tried harder to contact Small before implementing the forfeiture, and that, as a result, the purported forfeiture was unconstitutionally effected.
I.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Robinson v. HanrahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Clara Torres v. $36,256.80 U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Jorge Sarit and Dennie Espaillat v. U.S. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Daniel GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Tourus Records, Inc. v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- United States v. One Toshiba Color Television Two Answering MacHines One Health Tech Computer Reginald McGlory in No. 98-3578 (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) (d.c. Civ. No. 90-Cv-00138) United States of America v. Assorted Jewelry Reginald McGlory in No. 98-3579 (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) (d.c. Civ. No. 90-Cv-00370)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Curtis Bernard MinorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.