Legal Opinion

Jorge Sarit and Dennie Espaillat v. U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 23, 1993No. 92-2001PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge.

This case involves plaintiffs-appellants’ attempts to recover $41,448.00 in U.S. currency, which was seized by the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) and has now been forfeited. In their civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 against the DEA and its agents, plaintiffs appeal two rulings by the district court. First, plaintiffs challenge the court’s grant of partial summary judgment for the defendants upon its finding that plaintiffs had received constitutionally adequate notice of the administrative forfeiture proceeding. Second, plaintiffs…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Lehman v. NakshianSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Robinson v. HanrahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Barrera-Montenegro v. USA & Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. Terry L. Madewell v. Mike Downs, Anthony P. Grootens, and John PrineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. GiraldoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API