Legal Opinion

Graffigna v. City of Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 7, 1986No. 3061PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

On December 8, 1978 the Appellant, Salvatore Graffigna, was held up and shot by an unidentified assailant in the SEPTA subway station at Broad and Race Streets in Philadelphia. Approximately two years later he filed suit against both the City of Philadelphia 1 and SEPTA alleging negligence because of inadequate security provisions in the subway concourse. SEPTA filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, arguing that the Appellant had failed to comply with the six month notice requirement of 42 Pa.C. S.A. § 5522. The statute provides:

§ 5522. Six months limitation(a) Notice…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Casey v. GeigerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Vann v. Board of EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. MELENDEZ BY MELENDEZ v. City of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Valley Forge Industries, Inc. v. Armand Construction, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Johnson v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Newman v. ThornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Boyd C. Wagner, Inc. v. Shamokin Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Donaldson v. RitenourSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Donaldson v. RitenourSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API