Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 11, 1985No. Appeal, No. 10 T.D. 1984PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

The appellants, Esther Powell Johnson and William D. Johnson, sued the City of Philadelphia and the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) in trespass for damages on account of injuries to Mrs. Johnson. The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County granted the city’s Motion for Judgment on the ground that the Johnsons’ claim was barred by the city’s governmental immunity 'Conferred by the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act (Act).1 SEPTA is not involved in this appeal.

While leaving the Broad Street subway concourse at the Tasker-Morris Station…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moran v. Valley Forge Drive-In Theater, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Murphy v. Penn Fruit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Carswell v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Mascaro v. Youth Study CenterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rhoads Et Ux. v. Lancaster Park. Auth.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Newman v. ThornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Johnson v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Johnson v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Ludwin v. Port Authority Transit Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API