Legal Opinion

Valley Forge Industries, Inc. v. Armand Construction, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 1977No. 555PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court should not have granted summary judgment because it improperly construed the statute of limitations contained in the Public Works Contractors’ Bond Law of 1967.1 This case draws into question the application and interpretation of an act of the General Assembly regulating the affairs of political subdivisions, municipalities, local authorities and the officers, employes and agents thereof. We, therefore, transfer this case to the jurisdiction of the Commonwealth Court.

*56The facts giving rise to the instant case are not in dispute. In…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. West Penn Power Company v. GoddardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. Yorktowne Paper Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Luckenbach v. LUCKENBACHSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Fenerty Disbarment CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Commonwealth v. RuccoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Joseph v. GluntSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Newman v. ThornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Abraham v. PekarskiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Trumbull Corp. v. Boss Construction, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Lara, Inc. v. Dorney Park Coaster Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API