Legal Opinion

Kizer v. Davis

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1977No. 2-1275A358PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, P.J.

Attorney James Kizer filed suit against his former client, Joyce Davis, to recover on quantum meruit for legal services rendered. Trial to the court resulted in a judgment in Davis’ favor, from which Kizer perfected this appeal. We reverse for the reason that the decision is contrary to law. The trial court’s reason for denying recovery is invalid.

The trial judge entered special findings and conclusions, upon his own motion, pursuant to TR. 52(A). 1 His “memorandum opinion and judgment” reads as follows:

“The plaintiff’s complaint is predicated upon the theory that he has performed services at…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Knox County Council v. State Ex Rel. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Webb v. BairdIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Frith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Geberin v. GeberinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Goldstein v. LeesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Biggs v. MarshIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Trotter v. NelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Cox v. UbikIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Galanis v. Lyons & TruittIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Committee on Legal Ethics of West Virginia State Bar v. TattersonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API