Legal Opinion

U-Totem Store v. Walker

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 30, 1984No. 2 CA-SA 0117PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

May a defendant who seeks to set aside a default depose the plaintiff for the purpose of securing evidence to demonstrate a meritorious defense? We hold that he may— that discovery for the purpose of satisfying the meritorious defense requirement is not precluded by the entry of default.

This court has jurisdiction to entertain this petition and to grant the relief requested by virtue of A.R.S. § 12-120.-21(A)(3). Although appellate intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not routinely exercised in discovery matters, Jolly v. Superior Court of Pinal County, 112…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. United Imports & Exports, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. City of Phoenix v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  5. Union Oil Co. of California v. Hudson Oil Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Goglia v. BodnarCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  2. Villa De Jardines Ass'n v. Flagstar Bank, FSBCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. Lang v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Gullett ex rel. Estate of Gullett v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  5. Cline v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Cal.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API