Legal Opinion
Sears Roebuck and Co. v. Walker
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 18, 1980No. 1 CA-CIV 5221PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONTRERAS, Judge.
The issue raised in this appeal is whether the trial court properly struck appellants’ answers and dismissed their counterclaims for failure to adequately answer interrogatories, thereby permitting appellee to obtain a default judgment. Because a threshold jurisdictional issue is presented, it is necessary to outline the procedural history which has taken place before multiple judges in the trial court and also an intermediate trip to this court by way of special action.
TRIAL COURT PROCEEDINGS
Appellee initiated this litigation in 1977 by filing a complaint against…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Sarah Helen Williams Dollar v. Long Mfg., N. C., Inc., and Third-Party v. Nichols Tractor Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of GrayArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Souza v. Fred Carries Contracts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- U-Totem Store v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Poleo v. Grandview Equities, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.