Daggs v. Hoskins
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment .of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District in and for the County of Coconino. Owen T. Rouse, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
SLOAN, J.—
only assignments of error made by counsel for appellant in his brief which are sufficiently definite to *302be considered are: 1. That the judge who presided at the trial below had no jurisdiction to sit therein, or make any order in the disposition thereof; and 2. The judgment is invalid because the trial court failed to file findings of fact and conclusions of law. The record shows that, after issues had been joined in the court below, a motion for a change of venue, based upon the prejudice of the presiding judge, was filed by the appellant. Thereupon the Honorable J. J. Hawkins,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Swanstrom v. MarvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Stansell v. CorningMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by4 opinions
- Main v. MainArizona Supreme Court · 1900
- McGowan v. SullivanArizona Supreme Court · 1898
- Willamette Box & Lumber Co. v. WheelerOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Newhall v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1900