Legal Opinion

State v. Ferraiolo

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 2000No. CASE NO. 99-T-0169PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William M. O’Neill, Judge.

This is an accelerated calendar case submitted to this court on the record and the brief of appellant, Rosario Ferraiolo. Appellant appeals his conviction from the Warren Municipal Court on one count of violating Howland Township Resolution 95-148 (“the ordinance”), which prohibits the keeping of barking and noisy animals. It states:

“No person shall keep or harbor any dog which howls or barks or emits audible sounds which are unreasonably loud or disturbing and which are of such a character, intensity and duration so as to disturb the peace and quiet of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. CollierOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Holderman v. Columbus Skyline Securities, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. City of Columbus v. BecherOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. City of Lebanon v. WergowskeOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Town of Baldwin v. CarterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  2. State v. WeaverOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. City of Columbus v. KimOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. BielskiOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. City of Columbus v. KimOhio Supreme Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API