Legal Opinion

City of Lebanon v. Wergowske

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1991No. CA90-04-027PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-appellant, Gilbert Wergowske, appeals his conviction in Lebanon Municipal Court for violating a “barking dog” ordinance.

On January 26, 1990, appellant was charged in a private complaint with violating Section 505.02 of the Ordinances of the city of Lebanon. It provides that “[n]o person shall harbor or keep a dog which by loud and frequent or habitual barking, howling or yelping shall cause annoyance or disturbance to the neighborhood.”

A jury trial was held on March 31, 1990. The evidence revealed that appellant owns two cocker spaniels. The complaining witness was Jack Bayes, who…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Northern Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of ParmaOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Village of Hudson v. Albrecht, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. TudorOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  5. State v. WearOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Town of Baldwin v. CarterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  2. State v. FerraioloOhio Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API