Mayfair Roofing & Renovating Co. v. Ramco Technologies, Inc.

The defendant-third party plaintiff Rameo Technologies, Inc. (Rameo), appeals from a judgment rendered for the plaintiff Mayfair Roofing and Renovating Company (Mayfair) on the plaintiffs original complaint, and for the third party defendant, the R. A. Civitello Company (Civitello), on Ramco’s amended third party complaint. Rameo claims that the trial court erred in rendering judgment in accordance with the factfinder’s findings of fact.1 It argues that the court erred (1) in concluding that Civitello, the general contractor, was not obligated to pay the subcontractor Rameo for work performed…