Legal Opinion
Argentinis v. Gould
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 28, 1990No. 8454PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
This is an appeal from the judgments rendered on consolidated actions. In the first captioned action, Takis Argentinis sought damages for breach of a construction contract and of an express warranty by the defendants, Paul L. Gould and Paul L. Gould, Inc. In the second captioned action, Gould sought to foreclose a purchase money mortgage granted by Argentinis and his wife, the defendants in that action, P. A. (Takis) Argentinis and his wife, Ourania Argentinis, securing the final payment due on the contract.1
After a trial to an attorney trial referee, the reported findings were accepted and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lukas v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Jones Destruction, Inc. v. UpjohnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- West Haven Sound Development Corp. v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Southern New England Contracting Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- DelVecchio v. DelVecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Argentinis v. GouldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Miller v. BourgoinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Intercity Development, LLC v. AndradeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Isaac v. Truck Service, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Cross v. HudonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.