Remy v. Olds
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, Merced County; Joseph H. Budd, Judge. Action by Thophile Remy against E. J. Olds and George H. Barfield for breach of contract. There was a judgment m favor of plaintiff and defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
TEMPLE, C.
Defendants take this appeal from the judgment and an order denying a new trial. This ease has been here before: 88 Cal. 537, 26 Pac. 355. In the opinion on the *242first appeal the substance of the complaint and the contract sued on are fully stated. The answer denies the existence of the contract, but admits that such a contract was agreed upon, and avers that it was to have been reduced to writing and signed by all parties; that it was reduced to writing, signed and acknowledged by defendants, and sent to plaintiff, who was to sign, acknowledge, and have it recorded. This was October…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Katz v. BedfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Wilson v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Remy v. OldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Leeke v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tanforan v. TanforanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Smith v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1947
- Cameron v. Ah QuongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Willard v. CarriganArizona Supreme Court · 1902
- Firlotte v. JesseeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.