Legal Opinion

Clements v. Hollingsworth

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 12, 1947No. 15908PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

1. It has been held that, where a general demurrer to a petition is overruled, the demurrant has the option of coming to this court by direct bill of exceptions, or of taking exceptions pendente lite, but that, if the latter course be followed, the ruling on demurrer becomes a pendente lite ruling which is reviewable only after final judgment terminating the case. Durrence v. Waters, 140 Ga. 762 (1) (79 S. E. 841) ; Gilbert v. Tippens, 183 Ga. 497 (1) (188 S. E. 699) ; Smith v. Barksdale, 199 Ga. 723 (1) (35 S. E. 2d, 149). This rule, however, does not apply in the instant case,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Krueger v. MacDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  2. Folsom v. HowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. Atlanta Baseball Co. v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  4. McCrory v. Grandy & SonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  5. Nelms v. KellerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Glynn Plymouth, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  3. Clements v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  4. Bickerstaff v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  5. Clements v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API