Clements v. Hollingsworth
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Where the Supreme Court reverses a judgment of the trial court, .overruling demurrers to a petition as amended, the petitioner on the return of the remittitur, but before it is made the judgment of the trial court, may amend the petition. Sammons v. Nabers, 186 Ga. 161 (197 S. E. 284). The previous rulings of this court, that the petition as then amended set forth no cause of action, becomes the law of the case. Rivers v. Key, 190 Ga. 852 (11 S. E. 2d, 14); Darling Stores Corp. v. Beatus, 197 Ga. 125 (28 S. E. 2d, 124). This means…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wallace v. MizeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Clements v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Sammons v. NabersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Rucker v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kiser v. KiserSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Southeastern Wholesale Furniture Co. v. Atlanta Metallic Casket Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Randall v. LeGateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Reserve Life Insurance v. AyersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.