Legal Opinion
Clements v. Hollingsworth
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 16, 1949No. 16483, 16484PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Candler, Justice.
On a former appearance oí the present case in this court we held that the petition did not state a cause of action and that the court erred in overruling general demurrers to both the main and the ancillary petition as amended. Clements v. Hollingsworth, 202 Ga. 684 (44 S. E. 2d, 381). The opinion filed contains a full statement of the pleadings as they stood when we considered the case before, and it is therefore not necessary to repeat them. They can be seen by reference thereto. On the return of the case to the trial court, the plaintiff again amended her main petition by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Smith v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Third National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Atlanta Baseball Co. v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Lankford v. MilhollinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- City of Atlanta v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. AyersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Willis v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Beadles v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Ramsey v. MercerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Alexis Inc. v. WerbellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.