Austin v. Bingham
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Decision
ROTH, Judge:
1] 1 Michael and Wanda Austin appeal from certain portions of a damages award in favor of Jon and Adree Bingham. We affirm and remand to the trial court for calculation of the attorney fees that the Binghams incurred on appeal.
T2 The Austins and the Binghams are neighbors in rural Neola, Utah. The Bing-hams have a private right-of-way to access their residence over the Austins' property. That right-of-way has existed for over thirty years, and during much of that time, it was the only access to the Bingham parcel.2 The right-of-way runs from the county road past…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Atkin Wright & Miles v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
- Reid v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
- Cook Associates, Inc. v. WarnickUtah Supreme Court · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fadel v. Deseret First Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- Anderton v. BorenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- Seamons v. WiserCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- Peterson v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- Mrs. Fields Franchising v. MFGPCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021