Legal Opinion

Anderton v. Boren

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 21, 2017No. 20160145-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:

¶1 Sharrol Anderton, Mary Blanchard, Terry Christensen, and Duane Boren Jr. (collectively, Appellants) appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of David L. Boren and Sherron L. Boren (collectively, Appellees). We affirm and remand to the district court for the limited purpose of calculating Appellees' attorney fees incurred on appeal.

BACKGROUND

¶2 Duane Boren Sr. and his wife, Sherron, had six children-Sharrol, Mary, Terry, Duane Jr., David, and Lucky. In 1980, Duane Sr. and Sherron created the Duane Boren Family Living Trust (the Trust). At that time,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Webster v. SillUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Smith v. Four Corners Mental Health Center, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Cabaness v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Jones v. BarlowUtah Supreme Court · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Heartwood Home v. HuberCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  2. Legal Tender Services v. Bank of American ForkCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
  3. Hansen and Mecham Investments v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
  4. Old Republic National Title v. Cap Fund 783Court of Appeals of Utah · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API