Legal Opinion

Frear v. Wilder

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1920No. 1275PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Submission Upon Agreed Statement oe Facts.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE JUSTICES BY

COKE, C. J.

This cause is liere on a submission on agreed facts. *604It appears from the record that Mary D. Frear is a resident of Honolulu, Territory of Hawaii, and that Charles T. Wilder is tax assessor for the City and County of Honolulu, Territory of Hatvaii; that on or about the 25th day of December, 1919, Mrs. B. F. Dillingham, mother of said Mary D. Frear, and a resident of said City and County of Honolulu, transferred and delivered personal property of the value of $90,000 to her daughter Mrs. Frear as a Christmas gift of said property and that Mrs. Frear…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Apokaa Sugar Co. v. WilderHawaii Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Haiku Sugar Co. v. JohnstoneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
  4. Kapena v. Bishop & Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Halstead v. PrattHawaii Supreme Court · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Bishop v. MahikoHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Re Taxes, Haw'n Pineapple Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Hawaiian Trust Co. v. BorthwickHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
  5. In Re the Excise Tax of Robert Hind, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API