Legal Opinion

In Re the Excise Tax of Robert Hind, Ltd.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1936No. 2259PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

BANKS, J.

This is an appeal by the taxpayer, Robert Hind, Limited, from a decision of the tax appeal court.

Pursuant to Act 42, 2d Sp. S. L. 1932, chapter 63, R. L. 1935 (later repealed by Act 119, L. 1935), the taxpayer, which operates a dairy business in Honolulu, filed a business excise tax return covering its operations for the calendar year 1933.

Section 1 of said Act 42 imposed an annual excise tax upon each person doing business within the Territory. Section 3 of said Act provided that the tax be measured by “(1) the net taxable income, if any, of such person…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Frear v. WilderHawaii Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Holt v. WoodHawaii Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Bishop v. GulickHawaii Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Oahu Railway & Land Co. v. ShawHawaii Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  2. In Re Taxes of JohnsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Re Taxes, Haw'n Pineapple Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Brodhead v. BorthwickHawaii Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Re Taxes, Haw'n Pineapple Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API