Legal Opinion

Apokaa Sugar Co. v. Wilder

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1913PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Submission Upon Agreed Statement oe Eacts.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

DE BOLT, J.

(Perry, J., Dissenting.)

This is a case submitted by the parties upon an agreed statement of facts. The facts thus agreed upon and signed by the parties are as follows:

“That the said Apokaa Sugar Company, Limited, is and was at all times mentioned herein a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the Territory, doing business for profit, and having its usual place of business within said Hirst Taxation Division of the Territory of Hawaii.
“That the said Charles T. Wilder is and was at all times herein mentioned the Assessor of said Hirst…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Castle v. LuceHawaii Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Bishop v. MahikoHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Narmore v. KawafuchiHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Oleson v. BorthwickHawaii Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Re Taxes, Haw'n Pineapple Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API