Legal Opinion
Apokaa Sugar Co. v. Wilder
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided June 3, 1913PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Submission Upon Agreed Statement oe Eacts.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT BY
DE BOLT, J.
(Perry, J., Dissenting.)
This is a case submitted by the parties upon an agreed statement of facts. The facts thus agreed upon and signed by the parties are as follows:
“That the said Apokaa Sugar Company, Limited, is and was at all times mentioned herein a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the Territory, doing business for profit, and having its usual place of business within said Hirst Taxation Division of the Territory of Hawaii.
“That the said Charles T. Wilder is and was at all times herein mentioned the Assessor of said Hirst…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Castle v. LuceHawaii Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
- Bishop v. MahikoHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
- Narmore v. KawafuchiHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- Oleson v. BorthwickHawaii Supreme Court · 1936
- Re Taxes, Haw'n Pineapple Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.