Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Suburban Lumber Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 30, 1941No. 7473PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
Our courts have been addressed by the constant contention that the National Labor Relations Board lacks jurisdiction. This is the more remarkable in view of its complete lack of success. Locusts destroy but appeals against regulation by the National Labor Relations Bo-ard of business on the ground that it is intrastate are harmless insects indeed. We know of only one case in which any court has dismissed the Board’s petition for that reason. There the business sought to be controlled was a California gold mining company and the only interstate elements were the purchase…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Condenser Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- National Labor Relations Board v. Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- National Labor Relations Board v. Poultrymen's Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Hernández Badillo v. Municipio de AguadillaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2001
- Margaret J. Martin v. United Way of Erie CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.