Legal Opinion

Wabash Railroad v. Jackson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1911No. 21,727PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From Wabash. Circuit Court; A. II. Plummer, Judge. Drainage petition by William A. Jackson and others against which the Wabash Railroad Company remonstrates. From a judgment for petitioners, remonstrant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

Appellees filed a petition in the Wabash Circuit Court, under the act of 1907 (Acts .1907 p. 508, §6140 et seq. Burns 1908), asking that certain lands in that county be drained by a public drain. Over the remonstrance of appellant, said drain was established so that it crossed appellant’s right of way. By their report the commissioners of drainage found for the construction of the drain, and the costs and expenses were fixed at $788.52. Benefits and damages were assessed, in which appellant was reported as benefited $60, and the assessment against it fixed at $50, but in their report, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Storms v. StevensIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. LuddingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Brosemer v. KelseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Baker v. ClemIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Ager v. State ex rel. HeastonIndiana Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. Tarrant County Water Control & Improvement Dist. No. 1Texas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. CloughIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Wabash Railway Co. v. ToddIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Wabash Ry. Co. v. South Daviess County Drainage Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  5. Click v. ArnoldIndiana Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API