Legal Opinion

Brosemer v. Kelsey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1886No. 12,646PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Pulaski Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZoblars, J.

On the 15th day of May, 1883, appellee received from the county auditor a tax deed for appellants’ land, based upon a sale made in February, 1881. In 1877 and 1878, two ditches, known as the Kelsey and Hissong ditches, were established by the board of county commissioners, under the act of March 9th, 1875,1 R. S. 1876, p. 428. In each of the proceedings, allotments of work were apportioned to appellants’ land, and they not having performed the work, it was sold by the auditor as in section 12 of the act provided. It was sold to W. Kelsey. He did the work which amounted to $165.31 in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Storms v. StevensIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Jackson v. State ex rel. DyarIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. McMullen v. State ex rel. KendleIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Young v. WellsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Vizzard v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Prezinger v. HarnessIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Peters v. GriffeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. McCollum v. UhlIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Board of Commissioners v. GruverIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Kirkpatrick v. PearceIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API