Legal Opinion
Wabash Ry. Co. v. South Daviess County Drainage Dist.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 3, 1926No. 7193PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARIS, District-Judge.
This is a writ of error, brought by the Wabash Railway Company to reverse the finding and judgment of the trial court upon certain exceptions filed by the plaintiff in error to the report of the commissioners appointed to assess damages and benefits in the matter of the organization of the South Dáviess County drainage district. -Par brevity and convenience the plaintiff in error will hereinafter be referred to as the railway, and defendant in error as the district.
Upon the coming in of a report of the commissioners, assessing benefits of $90,000 against the railway and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- New Orleans Gas Light Co. v. Drainage Commission of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Heim v. McCallSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Blair v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- Southeast Cass Water Resource District v. Burlington Northern RailroadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Harrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Southeast Cass Water Resource District v. Burlington Northern RailroadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995