Brice v. Walker
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
The plaintiff, claiming to be the owner and entitled to the possession of a certain automobile, brought this action to recover possession thereof. Judgment having been entered in favor of the defendant, the plaintiff appeals therefrom.
On the seventeenth day of November, 1916, the plaintiff’s father, Charles P. Brice, being then and there the owner of said automobile, made and delivered his note of that date at Los Angeles, California, due six months after date, for the sum of three hundred dollars, to the Western Union Life Insurance Company, together with a mortgage of the automobile, as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Spect v. SpectCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Booth v. HoskinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Grant v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Parke & Lacy Co. v. White River Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Martin Music Co. v. RobbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Coburn v. CoburnMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- De Laval Pacific Co. v. United Cleaners & Dyers Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Dong Suk Shin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Prestige Ltd. Partnership-Concord v. East Bay Car Wash Partners (In Re Prestige Ltd. Partnership-Concord)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.