Legal Opinion
Bragdon v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 30, 1995No. 92-CF-648PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Per curiam
A jury found appellant guilty of one count of assault with intent to rape while armed, as a lesser included offense of armed rape, and one count of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence. On appeal, appellant contends primarily that the trial court erred in (1) admitting into evidence a videotaped identification; and (2) instructing the jury on assault with intent to commit armed rape as a lesser included offense of armed rape. Rejecting the dissent’s contention that appellant was entitled to “roll the dice” on the armed rape charge on the facts of this case, we affirm.
I
With…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Glymph v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Lee v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Street v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Pounds v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Salmon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Parker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Peyton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Coleman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.